Projection Methods
Here, we first include a brief discussion of projection methodology for incompressible and low Mach number flow. Details of AMReX-Hydro’s implementation of projections follow.
The compressible Navier-Stokes equations can be written in the form:
where \({{\bf U}}\) is a vector of conserved quantities, \({{\bf U}}= (\rho, \rho u, \rho E)\), with \(\rho\) the density, \(u\) the velocity, \(E\) the total energy per unit mass, and \(S\) are source terms. This system can be expressed as a coupled set of advection/diffusion equations:
where \({\bf q}\) are called the primitive variables, \(A\) is the advective flux Jacobian, \(A \equiv \partial F / \partial U\), \(D\) are diffusion terms, and \({\cal S}\) are the transformed sources. The eigenvalues of the matrix \(A\) are the characteristic speeds—the real-valued speeds at which information propagates in the system, \(u\) and \(u \pm c\), where \(c\) is the sound speed. Solution methods for the compressible equations that are strictly conservative make use of this wave-nature to compute advective fluxes at the interfaces of grid cells. Diffusive fluxes can be computed either implicit or explicit in time, and are added to the advective fluxes, and used, along with the source terms to update the state in time. An excellent introduction to these methods is provided by LeVeque’s book [LeVeque, 2002]. The timestep for these methods is limited by all three processes and their numerical implementation. Typically, advection terms are treated time-explicitly, and the time step will be constrained by the time it takes for the maximum characteristic speed to traverse one grid cell. However, in low speed flow applications, it can be shown the acoustics transport very little energy in the system. As a result, the time-step restrictions arising from numerical treatment of the advection terms can be unnecessarily limited, even if A-stable methods are used to incorporate the diffusion and source terms.
In contrast, solving incompressible or low Mach number systems typically involves a stage where one or more advection-like equations are solved (representing, e.g. conservation of mass and momentum), and coupling that advance with a divergence constraint on the velocity field. For example, the equations of invicid constant-density incompressible flow are:
Here, \({{\bf U}}\) represents the velocity vector and \(p\) is the dynamical pressure. The time-evolution equation for the velocity (Eq. [eq:incompressible_u]) can be solved using techniques similar to those developed for compressible hydrodynamics, updating the old velocity, \({{\bf U}}^n\), to the new time-level, \({{\bf U}}^\star\). Here the “\(^\star\)” indicates that the updated velocity does not, in general, satisfy the divergence constraint. A projection method will take this updated velocity and force it to obey the constraint equation. The basic idea follows from the fact that any vector field can be expressed as the sum of a divergence-free quantity and the gradient of a scalar. For the velocity, we can write:
where \({{\bf U}}^d\) is the divergence free portion of the velocity vector, \({{\bf U}}^\star\), and \(\phi\) is a scalar. Taking the divergence of Eq. ([eq:decomposition]), we have
(where we used \(\nabla \cdot {{\bf U}}^d = 0\)). With appropriate boundary conditions, this Poisson equation can be solved for \(\phi\), and the final, divergence-free velocity can be computed as
Because soundwaves are filtered, the timestep constraint now depends only on \(|{{\bf U}}|\).
Extensions to variable-density incompressible flows [Bell and Marcus, 1992] involve a slightly different decomposition of the velocity field and, as a result, a slightly different, variable-coefficient Poisson equation. There are also a variety of different ways to express what is being projected [Almgren et al., 2000], and different discretizations of the divergence and gradient operators lead to slightly different mathematical properties of the methods (leading to “approximate projections” [Almgren et al., 1996]).
For second-order methods, two projections are typically done per timestep. First, the ‘MAC’ projection [Bell et al., 1991] operates on the half-time, edge-centered advective velocities, making sure that they satisfy the divergence constraint. These advective velocities are used to construct the fluxes through the interfaces to advance the solution to the new time. The second projection operates on the cell-centered velocities at the new time, again enforcing the divergence constraint.
AMReX-Hydro provides two projection classes: the MacProjector
class
for face-centered velocity fields and NodalProjector
for cell-centered
velocity fields. The projection classes use AMReX’s linear solvers internally.
Both classes provide member functions getLinOp
and getMLMG
to
access the underlying objects and allow for modification of the linear operator
and multigrid properties if needed.
Details of the linear solver implementations are in the Linear Solvers
section of AMReX’s documentation.
Both Projector classes provide the following parameters, which can be set in an inputs file or on the command line. For the MacProjector, these must be preceded by “mac_proj.”, or for the NodalProjector, “nodal_proj.”
Description |
Type |
Default |
|
verbose |
Verbosity in nodal projection |
Int |
0 |
bottom_verbose |
Verbosity of the bottom solver in nodal projection |
Int |
0 |
maxiter |
Maximum number of iterations |
Int |
MAC: 200 Nodal: 100 |
bottom_maxiter |
Maximum number of iterations in the bottom solver if using bicg, cg, bicgcg or cgbicg |
Int |
MAC: 200 Nodal: 100 |
bottom_solver |
Which bottom solver to use. Options are bicgcg, bicgstab, cg, cgbicg, smoother or hypre |
String |
bicgcg |
bottom_rtol |
Relative tolerance |
Real |
1.0e-4 |
bottom_atol |
Absolute tolerance, a negative number means it won’t be used |
Real |
-1.0 |
num_pre_smooth |
Number of smoother iterations when going down the V-cycle |
Int |
2 |
num_post_smooth |
Number of smoother iterations when going up the V-cycle |
Int |
2 |
MAC Projection
For a velocity field \(U = (u,v,w)\) defined on faces, i.e. \(u\) is defined on x-faces, \(v\) is defined on y-faces, and \(w\) is defined on z-faces, AMReX-Hydro provides an exact projection we refer to as a MAC projection. For this we solve
for \(\phi\) and then set
where \(U^*\) is a vector field (typically velocity) that we want to satisfy \(D(U) = S\). For incompressible flow, \(S = 0\).
The MacProjector
class can be defined and used to perform the MAC projection without explicitly
calling the solver directly. In addition to solving the Poisson equation (either variable or
constant coefficient),
the MacProjector internally computes the divergence of the vector field, \(D(U^*)\),
to compute the right-hand-side, and after the solve, subtracts the weighted gradient term to
make the vector field result satisfy the divergence constraint.
In the simplest form of the call, \(S\) is assumed to be zero and does not need to be specified. Typically, the user does not allocate the solution array, but it is also possible to create and pass in the solution array and have \(\phi\) returned as well as \(U\).
The MacProjector class defaults to homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions at domain
boundaries; for this case nothing further needs to be done.
Non-homogeneous Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions at domain boundaries are set with
member function void setLevelBC (int amrlev, const amrex::MultiFab* levelbcdata)
.
If the MAC projection base level doesn’t cover the full domain, one must pass boundary conditions
that come from coarser data with member function
void setCoarseFineBC (const amrex::MultiFab* crse, int crse_ratio)
The code below is taken from AMReX-Hydro/Tests/MAC_Projection_EB/main.cpp
,
and demonstrates how to set up the MACProjector object and use it to perform a MAC projection.
Code Example - MacProjector object setup and MAC projection.
EBFArrayBoxFactory factory(eb_level, geom, grids, dmap, ng_ebs, ebs);
// allocate face-centered velocities and face-centered beta coefficient
for (int idim = 0; idim < AMREX_SPACEDIM; ++idim) {
vel[idim].define (amrex::convert(grids,IntVect::TheDimensionVector(idim)), dmap, 1, 1,
MFInfo(), factory);
beta[idim].define(amrex::convert(grids,IntVect::TheDimensionVector(idim)), dmap, 1, 0,
MFInfo(), factory);
beta[idim].setVal(1.0); // set beta to 1
}
// If we want to use phi elsewhere, we must create an array in which to return the solution
// MultiFab phi_inout(grids, dmap, 1, 1, MFInfo(), factory);
// If we want to supply a non-zero S we must allocate and fill it outside the solver
// MultiFab S(grids, dmap, 1, 0, MFInfo(), factory);
// Set S here ...
// set initial velocity to U=(1,0,0)
AMREX_D_TERM(vel[0].setVal(1.0);,
vel[1].setVal(0.0);,
vel[2].setVal(0.0););
LPInfo lp_info;
// If we want to use hypre to solve the full problem we do not need to coarsen the GMG stencils
if (use_hypre_as_full_solver)
lp_info.setMaxCoarseningLevel(0);
// Note that when we build with USE_EB = TRUE, we must specify whether the quantities are located
// at centers (MLMG::Location::CellCenter, MLMG::Location::FaceCenter) or
// centroids (MLMG::Location::CellCentroid, MLMG::Location::FaceCentroid).
MacProjector macproj({amrex::GetArrOfPtrs(vel)}, // mac velocity
MLMG::Location::FaceCenter, // Location of vel
{amrex::GetArrOfConstPtrs(beta)}, // beta
MLMG::Location::FaceCenter, // Location of beta
MLMG::Location::CellCenter, // Location of solution variable phi
{geom}, // the geometry object
lp_info); // structure for passing info to the operator
// Here we specify the desired divergence S
// MacProjector macproj({amrex::GetArrOfPtrs(vel)}, // mac velocity
// MLMG::Location::FaceCenter, // Location of vel
// {amrex::GetArrOfConstPtrs(beta)}, // beta
// MLMG::Location::FaceCenter, // Location of beta
// MLMG::Location::CellCenter, // Location of solution variable phi
// {geom}, // the geometry object
// lp_info, // structure for passing info to the operator
// {&S}, // defines the specified RHS divergence
// MLMG::Location::CellCenter); // Location of S
// Set bottom-solver to use hypre instead of native BiCGStab
if (use_hypre_as_full_solver || use_hypre_as_bottom_solver)
macproj.setBottomSolver(MLMG::BottomSolver::hypre);
// Set boundary conditions.
// Here we use Neumann on the low x-face, Dirichlet on the high x-face,
// and periodic in the other two directions
// (the first argument is for the low end, the second is for the high end)
// Note that Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions are assumed to be homogeneous.
macproj.setDomainBC({AMREX_D_DECL(LinOpBCType::Neumann,
LinOpBCType::Periodic,
LinOpBCType::Periodic)},
{AMREX_D_DECL(LinOpBCType::Dirichlet,
LinOpBCType::Periodic,
LinOpBCType::Periodic)});
macproj.setVerbose(mg_verbose);
macproj.setBottomVerbose(bottom_verbose);
// Define the relative tolerance
Real reltol = 1.e-8;
// Define the absolute tolerance; note that this argument is optional
Real abstol = 1.e-15;
// Solve for phi and subtract from the velocity to make it divergence-free
// Here, we specify that velocities are at face centers
macproj.project(reltol,abstol,MLMG::Location::FaceCenter);
// If we want to use phi elsewhere, we can pass in an array in which to return the solution
// macproj.project({&phi_inout},reltol,abstol,MLMG::Location::FaceCenter);
Nodal Projection
For a velocity field \(U = (u,v,w)\) defined with all components co-located on cell centers, AMReX-Hydro provides an approximate projection we refer to as a nodal projection. Velocity divergence and pressure are defined on nodes, and the pressure gradient is defined at cell centers as the cell average of face-based values. It is the use of this cell-averaged pressure gradient that makes this projection approximate rather than exact.
As with the MAC projection, consider that we want to solve
for \(\phi\) and then set
where \(U^*\) is a vector field defined on cell centers and we want to satisfy \(D(U) = S\). For incompressible flow, \(S = 0\).
Currently this nodal approximate projection does not exist in a separate operator like the MAC projection; instead we demonstrate below the steps needed to compute the approximate projection. This means we must
The NodalProjector
class can be used to solve the nodal projection without explicitly
calling the linear solver. In addition to solving the nodal variable coefficient Poisson
equation, it internally computes the right-hand-side,
including the the divergence of the vector field, \(D(U^*)\),
and also subtracts the weighted gradient term to make the vector field result satisfy the
divergence constraint.
The NodalProjector class does not provide defaults for domain boundary conditions, and thus
member function void setLevelBC (int amrlev, const amrex::MultiFab* levelbcdata)
must always be called.
The code below is taken from AMReX-Hydro/Tests/Nodal_Projection_EB/main.cpp
,
and demonstrates how to set up the NodalProjector object and use it to perform a nodal projection.
Example Code - NodalProjector object setup and nodal projection.
//
// Given a cell-centered velocity (vel) field, a cell-centered
// scalar field (sigma) field, and a source term S (either node-
// or cell-centered )solve:
//
// div( sigma * grad(phi) ) = div(vel) - S
//
// and then perform the projection:
//
// vel = vel - sigma * grad(phi)
//
//
// Create the cell-centered velocity field we want to project.
// Set velocity field to (1,0,0) including ghost cells for this example
//
MultiFab vel(grids, dmap, AMREX_SPACEDIM, 1, MFInfo(), factory);
vel.setVal(1.0, 0, 1, 1);
vel.setVal(0.0, 1, AMREX_SPACEDIM-1, 1);
//
// Create the cell-centered sigma field and set it to 1 for this example
//
MultiFab sigma(grids, dmap, 1, 1, MFInfo(), factory);
sigma.setVal(1.0);
//
// Create cell-centered contributions to RHS and set it to zero for this example
//
MultiFab S_cc(grids, dmap, 1, 1, MFInfo(), factory);
S_cc.setVal(0.0);
//
// Create node-centered contributions to RHS and set it to zero for this example
//
const BoxArray & nd_grids = amrex::convert(grids, IntVect::TheNodeVector()); // nodal grids
MultiFab S_nd(nd_grids, dmap, 1, 1, MFInfo(), factory);
S_nd.setVal(0.0);
//
// Setup linear operator, AKA the nodal Laplacian
//
LPInfo lp_info;
// If we want to use hypre to solve the full problem we do not need to coarsen the GMG stencils
// if (use_hypre_as_full_solver)
// lp_info.setMaxCoarseningLevel(0);
// Setup nodal projector object
Hydro::NodalProjector nodal_proj({vel}, {sigma}, {geom}, lp_info, {rhs_cc}, {rhs_nd});
// Set boundary conditions.
// Here we use Neumann on the low x-face, Dirichlet on the high x-face,
// and periodic in the other two directions
// (the first argument is for the low end, the second is for the high end)
// Note that Dirichlet boundary conditions are assumed to be homogeneous (i.e. phi = 0)
nodal_proj.setDomainBC({AMREX_D_DECL(LinOpBCType::Neumann,
LinOpBCType::Periodic,
LinOpBCType::Periodic)},
{AMREX_D_DECL(LinOpBCType::Dirichlet,
LinOpBCType::Periodic,
LinOpBCType::Periodic)});
//
// Solve div( sigma * grad(phi) ) = RHS
//
nodal_proj.project( reltol, abstol);
// Optionally, the projection can return the resulting phi and/or phi can be used to provide
// an initial guess if available.
//
// MultiFab phi(nd_grids, dmap, 1, 1, MFInfo(), factory);
// phi.setVal(0.0); // Must initialize phi; we simply set to 0 for this example.
// nodal_proj.project( {&phi}, reltol, abstol);